Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for ELEANOR GT, serial 86129675, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
ELEANOR GTSerial 86129675 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Denice Shakarian Halicki
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 012 -
Class 025 - Clothing
Class 028 -
Filed Nov 26, 2013
The record shows that “ELEANOR GT” is an abandoned application, filed by individual Denice Shakarian Halicki on Nov 26 2013 and dismissed after an inter‑partes decision by the TTAB on Dec 19 2014; it never entered the register. The filing listed goods in four classes: Class 009 covering video‑game cartridges, downloadable interactive recordings and related prerecorded media; Class 012 covering automobiles, automobile engines, structural parts, license‑plate holders and insignia badges; Class 025 covering a wide range of clothing such as belts, children’s apparel, denim, shirts, jackets, pants, dresses and related accessories; and Class 028 covering electronic and non‑electronic toy vehicles, model cars, radio‑controlled toys and related kits. A similar name would be most concerning if used for any of those products, especially video‑games, automotive parts, apparel or toy vehicles, because the record’s scope is concentrated there. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of “ELEANOR GT” in other markets. No prosecution history or enforcement actions appear, and the only notable status event is the abandonment in December 2014. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to use the same wording for any of the listed goods, but it does not automatically block unrelated uses.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.