Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for CINDERELLA, serial 86139261, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
CINDERELLASerial 86139261 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Disney Enterprises, Inc.
Class 029 - Meats & Processed Foods
Filed Dec 10, 2013
The record shows a dead application for the mark CINDERELLA owned by Disney Enterprises, Inc.; it was abandoned on June 20 2016 because no Statement of Use was filed after the Notice of Allowance. The filing covered only class 029 – a long list of foods such as applesauce, banana chips, chocolate milk, jams, jellies, processed fruits and vegetables, frozen meals, hot dogs, meat products and snack mixes – so a similar name used on any of those food items would create the closest record‑based concern. The record does not give Disney control over every use of the word “Cinderella” in other industries or contexts. This was a Principal Register filing, not a Supplemental Register entry, and the prosecution history shows a final refusal in 2014, a later allowance, and then abandonment when the required use evidence was never submitted. The supplied history contains no opposition, cancellation or court actions, so no enforcement signal appears. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to brand food products similar to those listed.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.