Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for FORSYTHE DATA CENTERS, serial 86224471, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
FORSYTHE DATA CENTERSSerial 86224471 · Supplemental Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: SIRIUS COMPUTER SOLUTIONS, INC.
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Mar 18, 2014
Registered Sep 09, 2014
The record shows that “FORSYTHE DATA CENTERS” is a dead service mark owned by Sirius Computer Solutions, Inc., a Texas corporation. It was registered on the Supplemental Register on September 9 2014 and cancelled on April 16 2021 because the registrant failed to file a Section 8 declaration. The mark covers services in classes 035 and 042, specifically the management, operation, design, and co‑location of data‑center facilities and related technical services. A similar name would raise the closest concern in those same areas of data‑center management and co‑location services. The record does not give Sirius control over every use of the phrase “data centers.” The prosecution history shows the mark was approved for registration on the Supplemental Register after a non‑final action and subsequent amendment, but no further enforcement actions appear. With no visible enforcement activity, the supplied history shows no active protection beyond the cancelled status. For someone considering a similar name, the risk is that the phrase is already associated with data‑center services, and using it in that context could create a potential conflict.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.