Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for PERQUE PROST8 VITALITY GUARD, serial 86229783, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
PERQUE PROST8 VITALITY GUARDSerial 86229783 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: Russell M. Jaffe
Class 005 - Pharmaceuticals
Filed Mar 24, 2014
Registered Oct 21, 2014
The record shows the mark PERQUE PROST8 VITALITY GUARD was registered on the Principal Register to Russell M. Jaffe but was cancelled on May 2 2025 because the required Section 8 declaration was not filed, so the registration is now dead. It covered only Class 005 – “dietary and nutritional supplements; dietary supplements; nutritional supplements,” meaning a similar name used for those kinds of health products would create the closest record‑based concern, while uses in unrelated fields fall farther from the scope shown. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the words “PERQUE,” “PROST8,” or “VITALITY GUARD” in any other context. The prosecution history shows the mark moved through normal examination, was approved for publication, and later received the required Section 8 and 15 filings in 2020 before the eventual lapse. No oppositions, cancellations, or court actions appear in the supplied history. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a supplement brand with a similar name, because the cancelled registration still signals prior use in that product category.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.