Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for DEATH2NORMALCY, serial 86255153, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
DEATH2NORMALCYSerial 86255153 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: D2N, LLC
Class 025 - Clothing
Class 029 - Meats & Processed Foods
Filed Apr 17, 2014
The record shows that DEATH2NORMALCY is an abandoned application, filed by D2N, LLC, a Delaware limited‑liability company, and it is not a live registration. The filing covered clothing (class 025) such as business suits, jackets, trousers, blazers, shirts, skirts, dresses, footwear, graphic T‑shirts and T‑shirts, and also olive oil (class 029). Because the goods are limited to apparel and a single food item, the closest area of concern for a similar name would be in the fashion or related clothing market; uses in unrelated fields would be farther from the scope shown here. The record does not give D2N, LLC control over every possible use of the words “DEATH2NORMALCY.” The prosecution history shows the application proceeded to a Notice of Allowance in February 2015, then the applicant repeatedly filed extensions of time to submit a Statement of Use, but ultimately no statement was filed and an abandonment notice was mailed on September 18 2017, which is the latest status event. No oppositions, cancellations or court actions appear in the supplied history. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to launch clothing under a similar name, since the abandoned filing still signals that the USPTO once considered the mark for that category.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.