Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for IMPRESO EN PAPEL RECICLADO RECICLAME POR FAVOR, serial 86256758, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
IMPRESO EN PAPEL RECICLADO RECICLAME POR FAVORSerial 86256758 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Petco Animal Supplies Stores, Inc.
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Filed Apr 18, 2014
The record shows that the application for “IMPRESO EN PAPEL RECICLADO RECICLAME POR FAVOR” is dead – it was abandoned on November 28 2016 because no Statement of Use was filed after the Notice of Allowance, and the USPTO mailed an abandonment notice that same day. The owner listed is Petco Animal Supplies Stores, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and the filing was based on an intent‑to‑use basis. The only goods and services covered are in International Class 035: promoting public awareness of recycling (including printed flyers and coupons), promoting animal‑supply products through printed materials, and retail or online store services for pet supplies, toys, food and accessories. A similar name would raise the closest concern if used for any recycling‑awareness campaign or pet‑related retail services, but the record does not extend to unrelated categories. No supplemental‑register filing appears, and the prosecution history shows only the usual extensions of the Statement of Use deadline before the final abandonment. The supplied history contains no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement actions. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to use the phrase in the same advertising or pet‑supply context.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.