Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for THE ULTIMATE, serial 86269326, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
THE ULTIMATESerial 86269326 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Mandt Bros. LLC
Class 006 -
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 014 -
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 018 -
Class 020 -
Class 021 -
Class 024 -
Class 025 - Clothing
Class 028 -
Class 038 - Communication Services
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Filed May 01, 2014
The record shows that “THE ULTIMATE” is an abandoned application (status dead) filed by Mandt Bros. LLC, a California limited‑liability company, and it never entered the register; the USPTO mailed an abandonment notice on Mar 25 2015 after the applicant failed to respond to a non‑final office action. The goods and services listed span many classes, including metal key chains and ornaments (class 006), computer‑game and entertainment software (class 009), jewelry and decorative items (class 014), paper goods and printed matter (class 016), bags and leather accessories (class 018), various household and novelty items (classes 020‑021‑024‑025‑028), communication services (class 038) and entertainment event production (class 041). A similar name would raise the closest concern if used for any of those listed items or services, but the record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “THE ULTIMATE.” No enforcement actions appear in the history, and the latest meaningful event is the abandonment notice in 2015. I'd treat this as a notable concern if you plan a mark covering comparable goods or services.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.