Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for NIKE+ FUELCOACH, serial 86296866, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
NIKE+ FUELCOACHSerial 86296866 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Nike, Inc.
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 038 - Communication Services
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Class 045 - Legal & Personal Services
Filed May 30, 2014
The record shows that the mark “NIKE+ FUELCOACH” was abandoned on January 11, 2016, after the owner, Nike, Inc., failed to file a Statement of Use or Extension Request following the Notice of Allowance issued June 9, 2015. The abandoned application covered a wide range of goods and services in classes 9, 35, 38, 41, 42, and 45, including electronic monitoring devices, retail and online retail services for apparel and sporting goods, online fitness coaching forums, and educational and entertainment services related to fitness and sports. Because the mark was never registered, the record does not grant Nike control over every use of the wording, but it does indicate that a similar name could raise the closest concern in the areas of electronic fitness devices, online coaching, and related retail services. The prosecution history shows a straightforward allowance followed by abandonment, with no opposition or enforcement actions recorded. For anyone considering a similar name, the abandoned status suggests a lower risk than a registered mark, yet the extensive goods and services list still represents a meaningful area of potential concern.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.