Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for GPT, serial 86329882, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
GPTSerial 86329882 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Gold Post Technologies, Inc.
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 038 - Communication Services
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Jul 07, 2014
The record shows that the mark “GPT” was abandoned by Gold Post Technologies, Inc., a Nevada corporation, after the applicant failed to file a Statement of Use or Extension Request following the Notice of Allowance. The mark was never registered and is not live. The abandoned application covered computer application software for handheld and internet‑capable devices, data‑processing software, portable computers with mobile communication, transmission of data and audiovisual images over the internet, and design and development of computer hardware and software. A similar name would raise the closest concern in those technology and communication services, especially software and data‑processing. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the word “GPT.” No enforcement actions, oppositions, or cancellations appear in the supplied history. The last meaningful event was the abandonment notice on February 8, 2016. For someone considering a similar name, the abandoned status reduces the risk, but the specific technology services listed still present a potential concern.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.