Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for UNITE THE FAITHFUL, serial 86330699, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
UNITE THE FAITHFULSerial 86330699 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: Club de Hockey Canadien Inc.
Class 006 -
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 011 -
Class 012 -
Class 014 -
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 018 -
Class 019 -
Class 020 -
Class 021 -
Class 024 -
Class 025 - Clothing
Class 026 -
Class 027 -
Class 028 -
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Filed Jul 08, 2014
Registered Mar 20, 2018
The record shows that “UNITE THE FAITHFUL” is no longer active – it was cancelled on Oct 4 2024 because the registrant, Club de Hockey Canadien Inc., did not file an acceptable Section 8 declaration, and the mark is listed as “dead · cancelled” on the Principal Register. The registration covered a very wide range of goods, from metal beverage cans and jewelry to clothing, paper‑goods, sports equipment, electronic loyalty‑program services and many novelty items, all listed in classes 006, 009, 011, 012, 014, 016, 018, 019, 020, 021, 024, 025, 026, 027, 028, and 035. A similar name would be most likely to raise a record‑based concern if used for any of those listed products or services, especially the sports‑related apparel, accessories, and loyalty‑program software. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “unite the faithful” in other fields. No prosecution history is shown, and the mark was never placed on the Supplemental Register. The only enforcement signal in the file is the cancellation itself; no oppositions, cancellations by third parties, or court actions appear. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to use the same wording for any of the goods or services listed, because the cancelled registration still reflects a prior claim to those categories.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.