Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for XCELL BMS, serial 86369588, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
XCELL BMSSerial 86369588 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Flight Systems Industrial Products
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Filed Aug 18, 2014
The record shows that the mark “XCELL BMS” is dead, having been abandoned because the applicant did not respond to an Office action. The owner listed is Flight Systems Industrial Products, a corporation organized in Pennsylvania, and the mark was filed on August 18, 2014 under an intent‑to‑use basis. The only goods listed are battery monitoring devices that may be attached to a battery to monitor performance, sold as a unit, in class 009. Because the mark is no longer active, it does not give the owner control over every use of the wording, but the record indicates that a similar name used for battery monitoring equipment could raise the closest concern. The prosecution history shows a non‑final action in December 2014 followed by abandonment in July 2015, with no later maintenance or enforcement events recorded. The supplied history shows no visible enforcement activity. If you are thinking of a similar name for battery monitoring devices, this history suggests a meaningful risk of confusion with the abandoned mark.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.