Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for LANGUAGE OF FLOWERS, serial 86378455, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
LANGUAGE OF FLOWERSSerial 86378455 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: L.O.F.T.M., INC.
Class 003 - Cosmetics & Cleaning
Filed Aug 27, 2014
The record shows that the mark “LANGUAGE OF FLOWERS” is dead, having been abandoned because the owner, L.O.F.T.M., INC., a corporation organized in North Carolina, never filed a Statement of Use or an Extension Request after the Notice of Allowance was issued. The mark was registered on the Principal Register for class 003, covering a wide range of cosmetics and cleaning products such as hair conditioners, shampoos, after‑shave lotions, anti‑wrinkle creams, and various soaps and cleaners. A similar name would raise the closest concern in the cosmetics and personal care sector, especially where the goods overlap with those listed. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the wording; it is limited to the specific goods in class 003. No enforcement actions, oppositions, or cancellations appear in the supplied history. The last meaningful event was the abandonment notice on October 3, 2016. For someone considering a similar name, the abandoned status reduces the risk, but the broad cosmetics coverage still suggests a potential concern if the new use is in the same or closely related category.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.