Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for PULP THEORY, serial 86395508, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
PULP THEORYSerial 86395508 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Quality Produced LLC
Class 032 - Light Beverages
Filed Sep 15, 2014
The record shows that “PULP THEORY” is an abandoned application – the USPTO marked it dead after the applicant, Quality Produced LLC, failed to respond to an Office action, with the abandonment notice dated July 27 2015. The filing was for intent‑to‑use goods in International Class 032, specifically a long list of fruit, vegetable, herb and nut juices and related protein‑based beverages; any new brand using “PULP THEORY” for similar juice or beverage products would run into the closest record‑based concern. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “pulp” or “theory” in unrelated categories, so unrelated goods are farther from the scope shown here. Because the application never reached registration, there is no supplemental‑register sequence to note. The latest meaningful event is the abandonment notice on July 27 2015, and the supplied history shows no oppositions, cancellations or court actions. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a juice or beverage brand with a similar name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.