Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for 1 ONEPLUS, serial 86399816, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
1 ONEPLUSSerial 86399816 · Principal Register
Live · Registered
Owner: ONEPLUSTECHNOLOGY (SHENZHEN) CO., LTD.
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Filed Sep 19, 2014
Registered Oct 27, 2015
The record shows that “1 ONEPLUS” is a live Principal Register registration owned by ONEPLUSTECHNOLOGY (SHENZHEN) CO., LTD., a corporation organized in China, and it was renewed with a status date of January 30 2026. The registration covers a broad set of electronic and scientific apparatus in International Class 009, specifically tablet computers, portable telephones, smartphones, protective covers for smartphones, wireless headsets, and various wearable digital devices such as smart‑watches and wrist‑bands that can access the Internet, make calls, and handle messages. Because the listed goods focus on consumer electronics, a similar name used for products outside that technical sphere would be farther from the scope shown here, but a name used on comparable devices would raise the closest record‑based concern. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “1 ONEPLUS.” No prosecution history or opposition entries appear, and the supplied history shows no enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a name in the same electronic‑device market.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.