Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for NEVER REGRET KEEP IT REAL, serial 86423751, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
NEVER REGRET KEEP IT REALSerial 86423751 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Vogue Vigour Express International Ltd.
Class 025 - Clothing
Class 043 - Restaurant & Hotel Services
Filed Oct 14, 2014
The record shows that “NEVER REGRET KEEP IT REAL” is an abandoned application – the USPTO marked it dead after the applicant failed to answer an Office action, with the abandonment notice dated September 8 2015 and no later activity. The owner listed is Vogue Vigour Express International Ltd., a Canadian corporation, and the filing was made on October 14 2014 on an intent‑to‑use basis. The application covered Class 025 clothing and accessories (including athletic, business, casual, infant and children’s wear, outerwear, shoes, belts, scarves, handbags, backpacks, bedding, pillows, sheets, quilts, mattresses, stationery, electronic products, coffee, wine and liquor, and household items) and Class 043 catering services. Because the filing never matured into a registration, the USPTO record does not give the owner control over every use of the phrase, but it does indicate a potential concern for similar marks used on clothing, accessories or catering. The prosecution history shows only the non‑final action and the abandonment; no oppositions, cancellations or court actions appear, so the supplied history shows no enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a moderate concern if you plan to use the same wording on apparel or food‑service offerings, since the abandoned filing signals that the USPTO once saw a possible conflict in those areas.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.