Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for ELSA, serial 86434119, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
ELSASerial 86434119 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: THE BABCOCK & WILCOX COMPANY
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Oct 24, 2014
The record shows the mark ELSA is dead – it was abandoned on Jan 9 2017 because the applicant never filed a Statement of Use after the Notice of Allowance, and the history contains no later activity; the owner listed is THE BABCOCK & WILCOX COMPANY, a Delaware corporation. The registration covered only “engineering and engineering consulting services relating to the control and monitoring of an air‑quality‑control‑system (AQCS) train, including controlling and monitoring the cost of the system reagents and power usage … for use in connection with power‑generating units” in International Class 042, so a similar name used in that technical consulting niche would present the closest record‑based concern. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the word ELSA in other industries or contexts. Because the application was on the Principal Register and never moved to the Supplemental Register, there is no supplemental‑register sequence to note. The latest meaningful event is the abandonment notice mailed on Jan 9 2017, and the supplied history shows no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement actions. I'd treat this as a modest concern if you plan to offer engineering‑consulting services for air‑quality control systems, but the risk is far lower for unrelated goods or services.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.