Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for DIMOND KNIFE SHARPENER, serial 86442173, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
DIMOND KNIFE SHARPENERSerial 86442173 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: JJL LLC
Class 008 -
Filed Nov 01, 2014
The record shows that “DIMOND KNIFE SHARPENER” is an abandoned application, filed by JJL LLC, a Missouri limited liability company, and it never reached registration on the Principal Register; the USPTO issued an abandonment notice on September 21 2015 after the applicant failed to answer a non‑final office action. The only goods listed are “Knife sharpeners” in International Class 008, so a similar name used for any kind of knife‑sharpening device would be the closest area of concern, while uses in unrelated categories such as clothing or food would fall farther from the scope shown here. The record does not give JJL LLC control over every possible use of the words “Dimond” or “Knife Sharpener.” No supplemental‑register filing appears, and the prosecution history simply reflects the missed response that led to abandonment. The supplied history contains no oppositions, cancellations or court actions, so there are no visible enforcement signals. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a knife‑sharpening product under a similar name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.