Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for MAKE IT POP, serial 86517121, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
MAKE IT POPSerial 86517121 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: DHX Media (Toronto) Ltd.
Class 021 -
Filed Jan 28, 2015
The record shows that the mark “MAKE IT POP” is dead and was abandoned by DHX Media (Toronto) Ltd., a corporation organized in Canada, because no Statement of Use or Extension Request was filed after the Notice of Allowance. The mark was registered on the Principal Register and covered a narrow range of goods in class 021, including lunchboxes, beverage ware, candy boxes, ceramic figurines, decorative plates, glass storage jars, serving trays, thermal insulated containers for food and beverages, plastic water bottles sold empty, dishes, pet feeding dishes, drinking steins, stone and earthenware coasters, travel mugs, hair brushes, hair combs, makeup brushes, candle holders, canisters sold empty for household use, charms for attachment to beverage glassware, cookie jars, decanters, decorative plates, flasks, insulating sleeve holders for beverage cans, and napkin holders. Because the record only lists these specific items, a similar name used for unrelated goods or services would be farther from the scope shown, but the record does not give control over every use of the wording. The prosecution history shows a Notice of Allowance followed by a Statement of Use extension request and eventual abandonment; no enforcement actions appear in the supplied history. The latest meaningful event is the abandonment notice on March 6, 2017. For someone considering a similar name, the closest concern would be for products in the same class and goods list, and the abandoned status means the mark no longer protects those items.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.