Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for MISS STRONG, serial 86602798, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
MISS STRONGSerial 86602798 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Smith, Leala
Class 044 - Medical & Beauty Services
Filed Apr 20, 2015
The record shows that “MISS STRONG” is an abandoned application, filed by Leala Smith on April 20 2015 and marked dead on July 25 2016 after the applicant failed to answer an Office action, so no live registration exists. The only goods and services listed are in International Class 044 – providing a website with information, advice, diet planning, weight‑loss and lifestyle‑wellness services, plus supervision of weight‑reduction diet plans. A similar name used for any health‑ or wellness‑related website or online diet program would be the closest area of concern, because the record’s scope is limited to those services; uses in unrelated fields such as clothing, entertainment or food products fall farther from the listed scope. The prosecution history shows a non‑final Office action in late 2015 and the subsequent abandonment notice in July 2016, but there are no indications of oppositions, cancellations or court actions, so the supplied history shows no enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a modest concern if you plan a health‑or‑wellness brand with a similar name, but the abandoned status means the USPTO does not currently control the wording.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.