Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for OBSESSED, serial 86620847, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
OBSESSEDSerial 86620847 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Make-Up Art Cosmetics Inc.
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Filed May 06, 2015
The record shows that the mark “OBSESSED” is dead; it was abandoned because the applicant, Make‑Up Art Cosmetics Inc., failed to respond to an Office action. The mark was a service mark on the Principal Register, filed on May 6 2015 with an intent‑to‑use basis, and it covered the administration of a customer‑loyalty program providing benefits and services related to cosmetics and beauty. A similar name would raise the closest concern in the cosmetics and beauty services area, especially where loyalty programs or related benefits are offered. This record does not give the owner control over every use of the word “OBSESSED.” The prosecution history shows a non‑final action in August 2015 followed by abandonment in March 2016, with no later maintenance or enforcement events recorded. Since the supplied history shows no enforcement activity, the owner has not actively protected the mark. For someone considering a similar name, the abandoned status reduces the risk, but the specific cosmetics‑related services remain a potential area of concern.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.