Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for LOVE ONLY VEINS ETERNITY L.O.V.E., serial 86664638, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
LOVE ONLY VEINS ETERNITY L.O.V.E.Serial 86664638 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Smith, Melvin
Class 025 - Clothing
Filed Jun 16, 2015
The record shows that “LOVE ONLY VEINS ETERNITY L.O.V.E.” is an abandoned application – the USPTO marked it dead on July 31 2017 after no Statement of Use was filed, and the owner listed is Melvin Smith, an individual. The filing covered only Class 025 clothing, specifically items such as children’s bottoms, gloves, hats, jackets, pants, scarves, shirts (including infant and toddler sizes), shoes, shorts, socks, suits, sweatshirts, undergarments and wristbands. Because the protection was limited to those apparel goods, a similar name used for unrelated products would present a far weaker record‑based concern, while a comparable name on clothing could raise a closer issue. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the words “LOVE ONLY VEINS ETERNITY L.O.V.E.”; it only reflects the abandoned claim for the listed apparel. No opposition, cancellation or court activity appears in the history, so the supplied record shows no visible enforcement actions. I'd treat this as a modest concern if you plan to use a similar name for clothing, but the risk is much lower for other product categories.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.