Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for UNIFORM OF LOVE, serial 86690830, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
UNIFORM OF LOVESerial 86690830 · Principal Register
Dead · Surrendered
Owner: LOVEWARE GMBH
Class 003 - Cosmetics & Cleaning
Class 024 -
Class 025 - Clothing
Class 026 -
Filed Jul 13, 2015
Registered Sep 27, 2016
The record shows that “UNIFORM OF LOVE” is no longer active – it was cancelled under Section 7 after the registrant, LOVEWARE GMBH (a German limited‑liability company), surrendered the Principal Register registration on Jan 3 2022. The registration covered soaps, perfumery, essential oils and cosmetics in class 003; various bed and table covers, duvets and pillow covers in class 024; a wide range of clothing items such as shirts, pants, dresses, footwear and headwear in class 025; and lace, ribbons, buttons and artificial flowers in class 026. A similar name would raise the closest concern if used for any of those listed goods, especially cosmetics or apparel, because the record’s protection is limited to those categories. The filing does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “uniform of love.” The prosecution history shows a normal examination, publication for opposition and registration, followed by a voluntary surrender; it never moved to the Supplemental Register. The latest meaningful event is the cancellation notice on Jan 3 2022, and the supplied history shows no oppositions, cancellations by others or court actions. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern for similar products in the same classes, but it does not block unrelated goods or services.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.