Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for MONTANA ANTLERS, serial 86702619, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
MONTANA ANTLERSSerial 86702619 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Justin Davidson
Class 031 -
Filed Jul 23, 2015
The record shows that “MONTANA ANTLERS” is an abandoned application, filed by Justin Davidson, a Georgia corporation, and it never reached registration; the last status event was an abandonment notice on August 8 2016 after the applicant failed to respond to a final refusal. The only goods listed are dog treats, edible chews for dogs and edible organic pet treats for dogs, all in International Class 031, so a similar name used for pet food or treats would be the closest area of concern, while uses in unrelated categories would be farther from the scope shown here. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the words “Montana” or “Antlers” in any context. The prosecution history reflects a final refusal in December 2015 followed by an abandonment in August 2016, but there is no indication of any opposition, cancellation proceeding, or other enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a moderate concern if you plan a pet‑treat brand with a similar name, because the abandoned filing still signals that the USPTO found a conflict in that product area.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.