Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for INSIDIOUS EXPERIMENTS, serial 86737330, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
INSIDIOUS EXPERIMENTSSerial 86737330 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Farr II, Davidson W E
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Filed Aug 26, 2015
The record shows that “INSIDIOUS EXPERIMENTS” is an abandoned application – the USPTO marked it dead on Nov 28 2016 after the owner, Farr II, Davidson W E, failed to file a required Statement of Use following the Notice of Allowance. The filing covered musical recordings (class 009), posters, drawings and art prints promoting a hard‑rock/heavy‑metal band’s recordings and announcements (class 016), and live vocal performances by that band (class 041). A similar name would raise the closest concern in the same music‑related and entertainment fields, because those are the exact goods and services listed; it does not automatically extend to unrelated categories. The prosecution history notes the abandonment notice as the last meaningful status event, and no oppositions, cancellations or court actions appear in the file, so the supplied history shows no enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to use the phrase for music or live‑performance services, but it does not block all other uses.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.