Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for BUILDING PERMIT DISPLAY THIS CARD ON FRONT OF JOB PERMIT: 066257632 ADDRESS: 101 ANY WAY STREET OWNER : JOHN DOE CONTRACTOR : CONSTRUCTION INC PURPOSE : WINDOWS & DOORS BLOCK : 10 LOTS : 22 RESIDENTIAL, serial 86745673, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
BUILDING PERMIT DISPLAY THIS CARD ON FRONT OF JOB PERMIT: 066257632 ADDRESS: 101 ANY WAY STREET OWNER : JOHN DOE CONTRACTOR : CONSTRUCTION INC PURPOSE : WINDOWS & DOORS BLOCK : 10 LOTS : 22 RESIDENTIALSerial 86745673 · Principal Register
Live · Registered
Owner: ARUBA PERMIT SERVICES CORPORATION
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 045 - Legal & Personal Services
Filed Sep 02, 2015
Registered Jun 21, 2016
The record shows a live, registered service mark owned by ARUBA PERMIT SERVICES CORPORATION. The mark is on the Principal Register and covers business services for identifying, expediting, and managing open, expired, or inactive building permits, as well as providing an online database of legal information related to building permits and code violations. A similar name would raise the closest concern in the same field of construction‑related permit services and real‑estate support. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the words “building permit” or “construction” in unrelated contexts. The most recent status event is the acceptance of the 8‑year and 15‑year sections on October 5, 2021, with no further enforcement actions recorded. The supplied history shows no oppositions, cancellations, or court proceedings. For someone considering a similar name, the risk is that use in the same permit‑management or construction‑support space could be viewed as infringing the registered mark.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.