Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for AIRBNB OPENAIR, serial 86759132, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
AIRBNB OPENAIRSerial 86759132 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Airbnb, Inc.
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Filed Sep 16, 2015
The record shows that “AIRBNB OPENAIR” is an abandoned application – the USPTO marked it dead on Oct 21 2019 after the applicant failed to file a required Statement of Use or an extension after the Notice of Allowance, and the owner listed is Airbnb, Inc. The filing covered Class 035 services for arranging, hosting and conducting business conferences and related events in the software development and advertising fields, and Class 041 services for organizing and hosting similar conferences and exhibitions for non‑business purposes. Because the record is limited to those specific conference‑ and event‑related services, a similar name used in a different context would be farther from the scope shown here, though the wording itself is not cleared for unrestricted use. The prosecution history shows a series of Statement‑of‑Use extensions that ultimately were not followed by a use filing, leading to the abandonment; the mark was never placed on the Supplemental Register. The latest meaningful event is the abandonment notice on Oct 21 2019, and the supplied history contains no opposition, cancellation or court actions. I'd treat this as a moderate concern if you plan to use a comparable name for conference‑type services, but the risk is lower for unrelated goods or services.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.