Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for BANNERLIFE, serial 86844573, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
BANNERLIFESerial 86844573 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Zheng Xitao
Class 011 -
Filed Dec 10, 2015
The record shows that “BANNERLIFE” is not a live or registered mark – it was abandoned on November 4, 2016 after the applicant failed to respond to an Office action, and the owner listed is Zheng Xitao as an individual. The application covered a very broad set of goods in International Class 011, including air‑conditioning apparatus, ventilation equipment, air filters, bicycle lamps and lights, coffee roasters and related appliances, among many other climate‑control and related items. Because the goods are centered on heating, cooling and related hardware, a later user of “Bannerlife” for products in that same technical area would encounter the closest record‑based concern, while uses in unrelated fields (for example, clothing or software) would be farther from the scope shown here. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the word “Bannerlife,” only over the listed goods. No Supplemental Register filing appears, and the prosecution history simply documents the non‑final action and the eventual abandonment. The latest meaningful event is the abandonment notice mailed on November 4, 2016, and the supplied history shows no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a moderate concern if you plan a similar name on air‑conditioning or related equipment, but the risk drops sharply for dissimilar product categories.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.