Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for WARBY PARKER, serial 86868562, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
WARBY PARKERSerial 86868562 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: JAND, INC.
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Filed Jan 07, 2016
The record shows that the mark “WARBY PARKER” is dead; it was abandoned because the owner, JAND, INC., a Delaware corporation, failed to file a Statement of Use or Extension Request after the Notice of Allowance on July 26 2016. The mark was registered on the Principal Register for class 035 services, specifically retail store services featuring chains and cords for eyeglasses and sunglasses, and containers for contact lenses, as well as online retail store services for the same items. Because the goods and services are limited to eyeglass and contact‑lens retailing, a similar name would raise the closest concern only if used in that same retail context. The record does not give control over every use of the wording. No enforcement actions, oppositions, or cancellations appear in the supplied history. The last meaningful event was the abandonment on August 26 2019. For someone considering a similar name, the risk is that using it for eyeglass or contact‑lens retailing could still be problematic, but outside that niche the concern is less direct.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.