Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for GRAHAM BEAUTY, serial 86878495, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
GRAHAM BEAUTYSerial 86878495 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Little Rapids Corporation
Class 003 - Cosmetics & Cleaning
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 021 -
Class 024 -
Filed Jan 18, 2016
The record shows that the mark “GRAHAM BEAUTY” is dead, having been abandoned because the owner, Little Rapids Corporation, did not file a Statement of Use or Extension Request after the Notice of Allowance. The mark was never registered on the Principal Register; it was only allowed and then abandoned. The goods listed in the application are beauty products such as nail polish removing pads, cosmetic pads, and beauty coils, along with paper beauty and barber items like neck strips, paper nail wipes, disposable drape sheets, and paper gloves. A similar name would raise the closest concern in the cosmetics and paper‑beauty product area, especially where nail or cosmetic pads are sold. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the wording, only over the specific goods listed. No enforcement activity—oppositions, cancellations, or court actions—appears in the supplied history. The last meaningful event was the abandonment notice on September 4, 2017. For someone considering a similar name, the abandoned status means the mark is no longer enforceable, but the goods listed still represent a potential area of concern if the new name is used in the same product lines.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.