Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for NTC NIKE+ TRAINING CLUB, serial 86923254, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
NTC NIKE+ TRAINING CLUBSerial 86923254 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Nike, Inc.
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 025 - Clothing
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Filed Feb 29, 2016
The record shows that the mark “NTC NIKE+ TRAINING CLUB” was abandoned by Nike, Inc., a corporation organized in Oregon, after the applicant failed to file a Statement of Use or Extension Request following the Notice of Allowance. The mark was never registered and is therefore not live. The goods and services listed in the application cover a wide range of fitness‑related items and services, including computer application software for fitness tracking, headphones and sensors, apparel such as shirts and jackets, retail and online clothing services, and educational and entertainment services related to sport and fitness training. A similar name would raise the closest concern in the areas of fitness software, fitness instruction, and related apparel and retail services. The record does not give Nike control over every use of the wording. The prosecution history shows a standard sequence of office actions and amendments, but no enforcement activity is recorded. For anyone considering a similar name, the abandoned status suggests that the mark is not currently enforceable, yet the detailed goods and services list indicates that a comparable use in fitness software or apparel could still trigger a concern.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.