Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for ROBLOX, serial 86928584, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
ROBLOXSerial 86928584 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Roblox Corporation
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 020 -
Class 021 -
Class 025 - Clothing
Class 028 -
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 036 - Insurance & Financial
Class 038 - Communication Services
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Filed Mar 03, 2016
The record shows that the mark “ROBLOX” is dead; it was abandoned because the owner, Roblox Corporation, did not file a Statement of Use or Extension Request after the Notice of Allowance. The mark was never registered on the Principal Register. The goods and services listed cover a wide range of items and activities, including video game software, computer software for interactive games, mousepads, cell phone cases, magnetically encoded gift cards, posters, pillows, water bottles sold empty, jackets, shirts, hats, plush dolls, action figures, an online retail store for clothes and accessories, virtual currency services, online chat rooms for game‑related topics, and entertainment services providing online interactive video games. A similar name would raise the closest concern in the areas of interactive gaming software, virtual currency, and online chat services. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the word “Roblox.” No enforcement activity such as oppositions or cancellations appears in the supplied history. The latest meaningful event was the abandonment on October 28, 2019. For someone considering a similar name, the risk is that the abandoned mark still shows a broad claim over gaming‑related goods and services, so using the name in those areas could create a meaningful concern.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.