Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for ANDROID TACTICAL ASSAULT KIT, serial 86933878, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
ANDROID TACTICAL ASSAULT KITSerial 86933878 · Principal Register
Dead · Withdrawn
Owner: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Mar 09, 2016
The record shows the mark ANDROID TACTICAL ASSAULT KIT is dead – it was expressly abandoned on June 14, 2016 by the United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Air Force, and it never reached registration. The filing covered a Class 042 service: “application service provider, namely, hosting, managing, developing, and maintaining applications, software, and web sites … for wireless delivery of content to handheld computers, laptops and mobile electronic devices.” A similar name used for technology‑related hosting or software services would be the closest area of concern, because the record’s protection (while it existed) was limited to those services. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the words “Android Tactical Assault Kit” in other fields. No Supplemental Register filing appears, and the prosecution history only shows the express abandonment. The supplied history contains no opposition, cancellation or court activity. I'd treat this as a modest concern if you plan a tech‑service brand that overlaps the described services.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.