Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for DRAGON BALL SUPER, serial 86950396, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
DRAGON BALL SUPERSerial 86950396 · Principal Register
Live · Registered
Owner: Kabushiki Kaisha Shueisha
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 018 -
Class 025 - Clothing
Class 028 -
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Filed Mar 23, 2016
Registered Jul 10, 2018
The record shows that “DRAGON BALL SUPER” is a live Principal Register trademark owned by Kabushiki Kaisha Shueisha, with a Section 8 and 15 combined declaration accepted on Feb 5 2026, confirming the registration is being maintained. The mark covers a wide range of entertainment‑related items, including DVDs, video‑game software and downloadable games (Class 009); clothing, shoes, hats and costumes (Class 025); tote and travel bags (Class 018); various toys and collectible figures (Class 028); and the provision of animated television programs and online video games for children’s education and entertainment (Class 041). A similar name would raise the closest concern if used for any of those goods or services, especially the video‑game, clothing or children’s media categories, because the record’s protection is tied to those specific descriptions. The record does not give Shueisha control over every possible use of the words “Dragon Ball Super” in unrelated fields. No oppositions, cancellations or court actions appear in the history, so the supplied history shows no visible enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern for anyone planning a name that touches the same entertainment or merchandise categories.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.