Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for OPENRIDE, serial 87028811, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
OPENRIDESerial 87028811 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Open Ride, Inc.
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Filed May 07, 2016
The record shows that the “OPENRIDE” application filed by Open Ride, Inc., a Delaware corporation, is dead – it was abandoned on July 2 2018 because no Statement of Use was filed after the Notice of Allowance, and no extension was requested in time. The only listed goods are “computer software for use in connecting and matching drivers of vehicles with passengers and for sharing the costs of transportation and travel” in International Class 009, so a similar name used for that type of ride‑matching software would be the closest area of concern. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the word “openride” in other industries or contexts. This was a Principal Register filing, and the prosecution history shows the usual sequence of extensions and a revival attempt before the final abandonment, but it never moved to the Supplemental Register. The latest meaningful event is the abandonment notice on July 2 2018, and the supplied history shows no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a moderate concern if you plan to launch software that matches drivers and passengers under a similar name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.