Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for CARTOON NETWORK COLLECTIVE, serial 87035990, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
CARTOON NETWORK COLLECTIVESerial 87035990 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: The Cartoon Network, Inc.
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Filed May 13, 2016
The record shows that the mark “CARTOON NETWORK COLLECTIVE” is dead, having been abandoned because the owner, The Cartoon Network, Inc., did not file a Statement of Use or an Extension Request after the Notice of Allowance was issued. The mark was filed on May 13 2016 and was published for opposition on March 28 2017. It was registered on the Principal Register for class 035, covering advertising and business services such as retail store services, mail order services, online retail store services, and providing home shopping services by means of television, all featuring a wide variety of general consumer merchandise. A similar name would raise the closest concern in the same advertising and business services area. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the wording; it is limited to the goods and services listed. No enforcement activity—oppositions, cancellations, or court actions—is visible in the supplied history. The latest meaningful event is the abandonment notice on June 25 2018. For someone considering a similar name, the abandoned status means the mark is no longer enforceable, but the specific services listed still represent a potential area of concern if the new name is used in a comparable context.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.