Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for GIGIT, serial 87069673, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
GIGITSerial 87069673 · Supplemental Register
Live · Registered
Owner: Gigit, Inc.
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Jun 13, 2016
Registered Feb 02, 2021
The record shows that GIGIT is a live, registered service mark owned by Gigit, Inc., a California corporation, and it sits on the Supplemental Register (registration number 6263161). The registration covers two classes: Class 035 for staff‑augmentation services that provide IT support staff and for updating and maintaining data in computer databases, and Class 042 for a range of technology‑related services including computer‑security assessments, IT consulting, network engineering, help‑desk support, data warehousing and related installation and repair work. A similar name used in these or closely related IT‑support and security services would raise the closest record‑based concern, while uses outside those described are farther from the scope shown. The prosecution history shows the application was filed in June 2016, published for opposition in August 2017, received a Notice of Allowance in October 2017 and was entered on the Supplemental Register in February 2021, indicating the USPTO found the mark descriptively weak and placed it there rather than on the Principal Register. The latest status event is the February 2 2021 registration; no further maintenance dates or enforcement actions appear in the supplied history. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a name that will be used for comparable IT staffing or security services.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.