Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for CRAZY SEXY FUN FITNESS, serial 87077885, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
CRAZY SEXY FUN FITNESSSerial 87077885 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Gayle, Christine
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Filed Jun 20, 2016
The record shows that the mark “CRAZY SEXY FUN FITNESS” is dead, having been abandoned because the applicant did not respond to an office action. The owner listed is Christine Gayle, an individual, and the mark was filed on June 20, 2016 under an intent‑to‑use basis for services in class 041, specifically “Fitness and weightloss training.” Because the mark is no longer active, it does not give the owner control over the wording in any other context. The closest area of concern would be any new fitness‑related service that uses a similar name, since that is the exact scope shown in the record. The prosecution history shows a standard sequence of a non‑final action followed by abandonment, with no indication of a Supplemental Register filing. The last meaningful event was the abandonment notice on May 15, 2017, and no enforcement activity is recorded. For someone considering a similar name, the abandoned status reduces the risk, but any use in fitness services could still raise a concern based on this prior filing.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.