Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for BROOKLYN FINE TEA CO., serial 87203031, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
BROOKLYN FINE TEA CO.Serial 87203031 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Christopher Johns
Class 030 - Staple Foods
Filed Oct 13, 2016
The record shows that “BROOKLYN FINE TEA CO.” is a dead mark that was abandoned on February 10, 2020 because the applicant, Christopher Johns, failed to respond to an Office action. The mark was filed on October 13, 2016 under an intent‑to‑use basis and was registered on the Principal Register for class 030, covering tea, tea bags, tea pods, tea substitutes, flowers or leaves for use as tea substitutes, instant tea, and mixes for making dried or loose‑leaf tea. Because the mark is no longer active, the owner no longer has enforceable rights in those specific goods, but the history shows that the mark was once considered distinctive for that category. The prosecution history indicates a series of suspension and non‑final action notices before abandonment, suggesting the examiner had concerns that were not resolved. No opposition, cancellation, or court action appears in the supplied record, so there is no visible enforcement activity. If you are thinking of using a similar name for tea‑related products, this abandoned mark still signals that the wording was once protected for those goods, so you should proceed cautiously.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.