Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for CHILLIN HARD, serial 87206330, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
CHILLIN HARDSerial 87206330 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Big 5 Productions, LLC
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Filed Oct 17, 2016
The record shows that “CHILLIN HARD” is an abandoned application (status “dead”) owned by Big 5 Productions, LLC, and it never entered registration; the last meaningful event was an abandonment notice on Jan 24 2022 because no Statement of Use was filed after the Notice of Allowance. The filing covered only class 016, specifically paper goods and printed matter such as fountain pens, writing instruments, non‑leather passport holders, plastic film for wrapping, date books, planners, drawing pencils, gift‑wrapping paper, magazines, ink pens, various cards, stationery, paper and cardboard coasters, vinyl static‑cling decals and paper party ornaments. A similar name used on any of those items would create the closest record‑based concern, while uses outside this narrow scope fall farther from the listed goods but are not automatically free of risk. The prosecution history shows a standard examination that led to a Notice of Allowance and then abandonment; no oppositions, cancellations or court actions appear in the supplied history. I'd treat this as a moderate concern if you plan to brand paper‑related products with a similar phrase.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.