Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for FUN, serial 87230295, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
FUNSerial 87230295 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: L'atelier Brands Inc.
Class 004 -
Class 006 -
Class 008 -
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 017 -
Class 020 -
Class 021 -
Class 028 -
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Filed Nov 08, 2016
The record shows that the “FUN” mark, filed by L'atelier Brands Inc. (a Cayman Islands limited liability company), is dead – it was abandoned on October 1, 2017 after the applicant failed to answer an Office action. The application covered a very broad set of goods, from candles and metal packaging (class 004, 006) to disposable cutlery, paper and plastic packaging, rubber and plastic bags, household utensils, toys, games and a range of advertising and business services (classes 008, 016, 017, 020, 021, 028, 035). Because the mark never issued, the record does not give the owner control over every use of the word “FUN,” but the listed categories indicate where a similar name would raise the closest record‑based concern—particularly for products like candles, disposable cutlery, packaging materials, toys or advertising services. The prosecution history shows only the filing, an examiner assignment, a non‑final action in February 2017 and the abandonment notice in October 2017; no oppositions or cancellations appear, so the supplied history shows no enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to use “FUN” for any of the goods listed, especially in the same classes, because the abandoned application still signals that the USPTO once saw a potential conflict.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.