Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for ROSE DE LUXE PARIS, serial 87277681, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
ROSE DE LUXE PARISSerial 87277681 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Madaras Gergely
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 031 -
Filed Dec 22, 2016
The record shows that “ROSE DE LUXE PARIS” is an abandoned application, listed as dead after the applicant failed to respond to an Office action, with the abandonment dated Dec 10 2018 and the owner identified as Madaras Gergely, an individual filing on an intent‑to‑use basis. The filing covered Class 016 paper goods and printed matter – specifically gift boxes and treated paper for wrapping flowers and floral displays – and Class 031 cut flowers, so a similar name used for floral arrangements, flower‑related packaging, or related printed materials would be the closest area of concern. The record does not give the owner any control over the wording in other product categories or in general use. The prosecution history shows a series of office‑action notices and a final refusal in May 2018, followed by the abandonment notice in December 2018; no later maintenance or renewal events appear. The supplied history contains no oppositions, cancellations or court actions, so there are no visible enforcement signals. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to use the same wording for gifts, flower‑related packaging, or cut flowers.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.