Status report

Get it in writing

The official USPTO status record for PERCY JACOBS, serial 87308277, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.

INSTANT DELIVERY

Trademark Status Report

$7.99

The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.

  • Current status with a plain-English verdict
  • Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
  • The mark as it appears on the federal record
  • Every prosecution event, filing to today
  • Source-cited with the exact retrieval date

Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.

Payments launch soon. Leave your email and we'll tell you when this report is available.

Searching stays free, no account, no caps.

Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
PERCY JACOBS
Serial 87308277 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused

Owner: Amcrest Global Holdings Limited
Class 003 - Cosmetics & Cleaning
Filed Jan 20, 2017

The record shows that “PERCY JACOBS” is an abandoned application – the USPTO marked it dead on Oct 23 2017 after the applicant failed to respond to an Office action, and no later filings appear; the owner listed is Amcrest Global Holdings Limited, an Irish corporation. The filing covered only Class 3 goods, specifically a long list of cosmetic and aromatic oils such as argan oil, baby oil, essential oils, bath salts and similar products, so a name used for anything in that cosmetics‑and‑personal‑care space would be the closest area of concern. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “Percy Jacobs” outside those listed items. Because the application was on the Principal Register and never moved to the Supplemental Register, the prosecution history simply reflects the non‑final action and the subsequent abandonment notice. The latest meaningful event is the abandonment notice dated Oct 23 2017, and the supplied history shows no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a moderate concern if you plan a similar name for cosmetics or related oils, but the risk drops sharply for unrelated goods or services.

Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.

The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.

Your name deserves a straight answer.

Search the federal register free. No account, no caps, no waiting around.

Run a free trademark search