Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for INBLOOM TOURS: FLOWERING INTO FLOW, serial 87317327, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
INBLOOM TOURS: FLOWERING INTO FLOWSerial 87317327 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: inBloom Tours
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Filed Jan 30, 2017
The record shows that the mark INBLOOM TOURS: FLOWERING INTO FLOW is abandoned, with the last status date of Nov 27, 2017, and the owner listed as inBloom Tours, a California limited‑liability company. The application covered “Conducting guided tours of global flower tour of festivals, shows and gardens” in International Class 041, so a similar name used for travel‑related flower tours would be the closest area of concern. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the words “INBLOOM” or “FLOWERING INTO FLOW” in unrelated fields. Because the filing was on the Principal Register and never moved to the Supplemental Register, there is no supplemental‑register sequence to note. The latest meaningful event is the abandonment notice mailed on Nov 27, 2017, and no further maintenance or renewal dates appear. The prosecution history shows no oppositions, cancellations or court actions, so the supplied history shows no visible enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a moderate concern if you plan a similar flower‑tour service, but the risk is limited to that specific class of guided tours.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.