Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for FLOR DE PIÑA, serial 87320960, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
FLOR DE PIÑASerial 87320960 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: DISTRIBUIDORA DE ALIMENTOS NATURALES Y NUTRICIONALES, S.A. DE C.V.
Class 030 - Staple Foods
Filed Feb 01, 2017
The record shows that “FLOR DE PIÑA” is an abandoned application – the USPTO marked it dead after the applicant failed to respond to an Office action, with the abandonment notice dated March 6 2018, and no later activity appears. The owner listed is DISTRIBUIDORA DE ALIMENTOS NATURALES Y NUTRICIONALES, S.A. DE C.V., a Mexican corporation that filed the intent‑to‑use application on February 1 2017. The only goods covered are in International Class 030 for staple foods, specifically candies, candy bars, caramel candy, lollipops, Mexican candy, chocolate candies, gummy candies and sugar‑less candies. A similar name used for any of those confectionery products would raise the closest record‑based concern, while uses in unrelated categories would be farther from the scope shown here. Because the filing never resulted in a registration, the record does not give the owner control over the wording in general. The prosecution history shows a non‑final Office action in August 2017 and a response in June 2017, but the final abandonment ended the process. No oppositions, cancellations or court actions appear in the supplied history. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to market candy or similar sweets under a comparable name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.