Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for JUS CHILLIN, serial 87360059, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
JUS CHILLINSerial 87360059 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Trice, Sharif
Class 025 - Clothing
Filed Mar 06, 2017
The record shows that “JUS CHILLIN” is an abandoned application, filed on March 6 2017 by the individual Sharif Trice, and it never entered the register because the applicant failed to answer an Office action, resulting in an abandonment notice on January 11 2018. The filing covered only Class 025 clothing items – a long list that includes bathing suits, belts, coats, dresses, jackets, hoodies, hats, and related apparel – so the closest area of concern would be any new mark used on similar garments. The record does not give the owner control over the words “JUS CHILLIN” in other product categories or in general language. Because the application was on the Principal Register and was abandoned, there is no later maintenance event or renewal date, and the prosecution history shows only the non‑final action and the abandonment notice; no oppositions, cancellations or court actions appear. I'd treat this as a modest concern if you plan to brand clothing with a comparable name, since the abandoned filing still signals that the USPTO once linked the phrase to apparel.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.