Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for PULP DESIGN STUDIOS, serial 87369105, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
PULP DESIGN STUDIOSSerial 87369105 · Principal Register
Live · Registered
Owner: Pulp Desgin Studios, L.L.C.
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Mar 13, 2017
Registered Nov 28, 2017
The record shows that PULP DESIGN STUDIOS is a live Principal Register service mark owned by Pulp Desgin Studios, L.L.C., a Texas limited‑liability company, and it has been active since its registration on Nov 28, 2017. The registration covers two classes: Class 035 for procurement services that involve purchasing furniture, fixtures or other home‑decorating products for others, and Class 042 for interior‑design services such as space planning, furniture and material selection, and whole‑house or single‑room design. A similar name would raise the closest concern if used for any of those procurement or interior‑design activities, because the record’s protection is tied to those specific services. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “Pulp” or “Design Studios” outside those described areas. The most recent meaningful event is the acceptance of the combined Section 8 (six‑year renewal) and Section 15 (continuation) filing on Oct 7, 2023, confirming the mark’s continued registration. No oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement actions appear in the supplied history. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to offer similar procurement or interior‑design services under a comparable name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.