Status report

Get it in writing

The official USPTO status record for CLOSE ENOUGH, serial 87374075, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.

INSTANT DELIVERY

Trademark Status Report

$7.99

The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.

  • Current status with a plain-English verdict
  • Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
  • The mark as it appears on the federal record
  • Every prosecution event, filing to today
  • Source-cited with the exact retrieval date

Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.

Payments launch soon. Leave your email and we'll tell you when this report is available.

Searching stays free, no account, no caps.

Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
CLOSE ENOUGH
Serial 87374075 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused

Owner: Turner Broadcasting System, Inc.
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Filed Mar 16, 2017

The record shows that “CLOSE ENOUGH” is an abandoned application (status “dead”) that was filed by Turner Broadcasting System, Inc., a Georgia corporation, and it never moved beyond the Principal Register filing because no Statement of Use was filed after the Notice of Allowance; the abandonment notice was issued on October 26 2020. The only goods listed are “audio visual recordings in all media, featuring entertainment in the nature of an on‑going television series in the field of comedy, action, drama and adventure; downloadable television programming featuring comedy, action, drama and adventure distributed via the Internet and wireless communications” (class 009). A similar name would raise the closest concern for services that involve streaming or downloadable TV content of that type, but the record does not give the owner control over all other uses of the words “close enough.” The prosecution history shows a series of extensions for filing a Statement of Use, ending in abandonment, but there is no indication of any opposition, cancellation, or court action, so the supplied history shows no enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to use the same wording for comparable video‑streaming or downloadable TV programming.

Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.

The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.

Your name deserves a straight answer.

Search the federal register free. No account, no caps, no waiting around.

Run a free trademark search