Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for THE MARK TITLE IS "PULL UP PARK JAM" ABBREVIATED TO "PUPJ" DESCRIPTION OF LOGO IN DETAIL: OUTLINE OF A MAN IN A PULL UP POSITION WITH THE LETTERS, "PUPJ" POSITIONED VERTICALLY ALONG SIDE IT. THE NAME "PULL UP PARK JAM INC AND "WWW.PUPJ.ORG" IS POSITIONED IN A RING ON TOP AND BOTTOM OF SAID LOGO IN A RING CONFIGURATION. WHAT PRODUCTS AND SERVICES ARE YOU OFFERING WITH YOUR TRADEMARK? PULL UP PARK JAM INC IS USING ITS TRADEMARK FOR BRANDING ITS FITNESS COMPETITION SERVICES. PULL UP PARK JAM INC IS ALSO USING ITS TRADEMARK FOR EVENT CLOTHING, NAMELY T-SHIRTS, SWEATSHIRTS, AND ATHLETIC ACCESSORIES. WHEN WE CAN WE PARTNER WITH RELEVANT ORGANIZATIONS TO PROMOTE THEM AND THEIR SERVICES AS WELL., serial 87385619, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
Trademark Status Report
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Serial 87385619 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Keith Fields
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Filed
The record shows that the mark “PULL UP PARK JAM” (abbreviated “PUPJ”) is a dead service‑mark application that was refused and cancelled because it did not meet minimum filing date requirements. The owner listed is Keith Fields, an individual, and the mark was never registered on the Principal Register. The goods and services claimed are fitness‑related, including advertising, promotion of sports competitions, and fitness boot camps, as well as the sale of event clothing such as t‑shirts and sweatshirts. Because the application was cancelled, the record does not give the owner control over the wording in any broader context. The prosecution history only shows the initial filing; no further maintenance or enforcement actions are recorded. With no visible enforcement activity, the supplied history shows no active protection or claims. If you are thinking of using a similar name for fitness or event apparel, this record suggests a potential concern in those specific fitness and apparel categories, but it does not preclude other uses.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.