Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for MISS C.C. LAFLOR, serial 87387595, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
MISS C.C. LAFLORSerial 87387595 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Walters, Carolyn C
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Filed Mar 27, 2017
The record shows that “MISS C.C. LAFLOR” is an abandoned service‑mark application, filed on March 27 2017 by individual Carolyn C Walters and marked dead on January 19 2018 after the applicant failed to respond to an Office action; there is no active registration. The goods and services listed are limited to Class 035 advertising and publicity services, specifically promoting third‑party goods, services, brand identity and commercial information through print, audio, video, digital and online media, plus development of marketing strategies and online community building. A similar name would raise the closest concern if used for comparable advertising or marketing services, because the record’s protection is confined to that description and does not extend to unrelated fields. The prosecution history shows an examiner’s amendment and priority action in June 2017, but the application never progressed to registration and was ultimately abandoned. The supplied history contains no oppositions, cancellations or court actions, so no enforcement signals appear. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern for anyone planning a comparable advertising‑service mark.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.