Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for MISS EVERGREEN, serial 87401332, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
MISS EVERGREENSerial 87401332 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: RUCA 1982, INC.
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Filed Apr 06, 2017
The record shows that “MISS EVERGREEN” is a dead application that was abandoned on Nov 23 2020 because the owner, RUCA 1982, INC., never filed a required Statement of Use after the Notice of Allowance, so it is not a live or registered mark. The filing covered Class 041 services – providing information, news, online journals, videos and seminars about agriculture and smoker’s articles, plus educational workshops and conferences in those fields – so a similar name used for anything in that agricultural‑or‑smoking‑related educational or entertainment space would be the closest record‑based concern. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “Miss Evergreen” outside those described services. This was a Principal Register filing, not a Supplemental Register entry, and the prosecution history simply moves from approval to a notice that a Statement of Use was required, followed by abandonment. The supplied history contains no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement actions. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to use a similar name for agricultural or smoker‑related educational content.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.